|
Since 2006, AAG has committed to seek joint accreditation with NEASC (New England Association of Schools and Colleges and CIS (The Council of International Schools).
Accreditation by NEASC is recognized by the U.S. Department of Education and indicates that a school meets or exceeds established criteria. Accreditation by CIS means meeting high level, challenging standards, which are designed specifically by and for American / International Schools.
AAG is in the candidacy stage of a 10-year accreditation cycle. We are proud to announce that we are on track as our programs have been put into place for over a year.
A few of the benefits of joint accreditation are:
1. The award of accreditation itself The school's own claim to excellence, however well justified, will always be open to question in the absence of an objective verification of quality. The school's earning of accredited status from respected agencies can be very reassuring to parents and faculty. It is an indication to the school community and to other individuals and establishments (including universities) that the school offers a quality education.
2. The opportunity for self-assessment To some extent continuous improvement is already a goal of schools, but not at the level to which self-evaluation is taken during the writing of the self-study when the school is working to meet clearly stated external standards and demanding deadlines. Schools earning accreditation status tend to agree that introspection has been the most valuable aspect of the entire process. Also of significant benefit is the opportunity for school staff to meet collaboratively, often across disciplines and divisions of the school, to discuss issues, to identify concerns, and to propose improvements.
3. The opportunity for improved intra-school contact and understanding In some schools it is quite possible to go from year to year feeling that staff members in other areas are vague acquaintances at best and that the concerns of other sections are of little interest to them. It is the common experience of schools undergoing evaluation that the accreditation process is a unifying force in a school.
4. The opportunity to receive an external assessment The Team Visit involves a detailed, objective evaluation which reflects the perspectives of fellow professionals who have been trained in the evaluation process and who are familiar with both the Standards for Accreditation and the unique nature and concerns of American/International schools.
5. A plan for the future The Self-Study document, the Visiting Team Report, the First Progress Report and the Five Year Reports serve as a guide to planning for the school as it maps out its direction for the years ahead.
6. Affirmation of the school's needs It may be that Governing Body members, staff, management, students or parents have felt the existence of certain needs for some time. The Visiting Team Report will serve to validate concerns and to guide staff, Governing Body and administration in establishing priorities and developing action plans.
NEASC / Commission on American and International Schools: http://caisa.neasc.org/
|